The longest running Amphibian Community on the Internet.

Tags Register FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Caudata.org Store Donate


Does anyone know of a study regarding...

This is a discussion on Does anyone know of a study regarding... within the Dendrobatids: Poison Arrow/Dart Frogs forums, part of the Anura: Frogs & Toads category; .... the CB toxicity of Poison Dart Frogs? I'm getting differing information (yep no kidding! ROTFL!). Its pretty much taken ...

Dendrobatids: Poison Arrow/Dart Frogs The place to discuss Dendrobatids.

Reply

 

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 17th June 2004   #1 (permalink)
sharon
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Gallery Images:
Comments:
Default

.... the CB toxicity of Poison Dart Frogs?

I'm getting differing information (yep no kidding! ROTFL!). Its pretty much taken for granted that most CB PDFs lose some or all of their toxicity in captivity. HOWEVER, some sites are saying that some PDFs produce their own toxins internally rather from eating bugs that eat alkaloid plants or some such thing.

Most sites state its a theory. I'm curious. I've done a search but I'm not coming up with anything other than the common hobbyist sites with the same "theories."

I'm known to ramble anyway, but when I'm sick it really does get worse! And since I'm getting worse, not better... well, my posts go the same direction! My apologies....

Sharon
  Reply With Quote
Old 17th June 2004   #2 (permalink)
edward
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Gallery Images:
Comments:
Default

Hi Sharon,
the genus Dendrobates, Phyllobates and Epipidobates lose the derived toxins in their skin which are the ones I would really worry about. As far as I know some of the Coleostethus (like the skunk frog) can still produce things like the smell which could be considered a toxin.
Some of the other poison frogs such as mantellas and Atelopus spp. do not appear to lose the ability to produce toxins.

Ed
  Reply With Quote
Old 30th June 2005   #3 (permalink)
jeff
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Gallery Images:
Comments:
Default

Here's the best way of explaining things as far as I know. WC or FR poison dart frogs retain their normal level of toxicity and the first two generations of offspring also retain the toxins (F1 and F2). It is believed that the insects they would consume in the wild hold alkoloids that assist in the development of a cutaneous poison. Hence no insects, no poisons. The strongest evidence to support this theory that I know of would be the difference between wild populations of Dendrobates Azureus located in the Four Brothers Mountain Range of Sipaliwini (sp?) Savanna and the introduced population of Dendrobates Azureus of a few small islands in Hawaii to control mosquito populations. Evidently, the D. Azureus in Hawaii had a significantly less potent toxin in comparison to those in Sipaliwini. Some frogs you just need to be careful with irregardless (i.e. Phyllobates Terriblis). So long as you don't decide to kiss your frogs, you'll have no problems.
  Reply With Quote
Old 30th June 2005   #4 (permalink)
Site Contributor
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Nationality:
Posts: 411
Gallery Images: 0
Comments: 0
Rep: caleb goes to 11caleb goes to 11caleb goes to 11caleb goes to 11caleb goes to 11caleb goes to 11caleb goes to 11caleb goes to 11caleb goes to 11caleb goes to 11caleb goes to 11
Default

Some of the confusion seems to stem from recent research which suggests that some dendrobatids actually convert chemicals from their prey into more toxic compounds. They certainly accumulate toxins from the insects they feed on.

So there are three main ways the frogs could become toxic:

1: By eating toxic prey, and accumulating their toxins.

2: By eating prey containing specific chemicals which are then modified to make them more toxic.

3: By generating their own toxins from the more general chemicals involved in normal metabolism.

Obviously the first and second methods mean that particular prey items are necessary to maintain the frog's toxicity.

Dendrobatids certainly use the first method and it seems likely that some may use the second.

I don't think they've been shown to use the third method- I believe this is how Bufo species (and Atelopus, as Ed mentioned) produce their toxins, though.
caleb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th June 2005   #5 (permalink)
alan
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Gallery Images:
Comments:
Default

The most accessible info on this topic I have seen (without going to the primary literature) is in:

http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg...id=1120130130/
  Reply With Quote
Old 30th June 2005   #6 (permalink)
2010 Research Grant Donor
 
michael's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Nationality:
Location: [ Members Only ]
Posts: 2,259
Gallery Images: 0
Comments: 0
Rep: michael is considered an Authority at Caudata.orgmichael is considered an Authority at Caudata.orgmichael is considered an Authority at Caudata.orgmichael is considered an Authority at Caudata.orgmichael is considered an Authority at Caudata.orgmichael is considered an Authority at Caudata.orgmichael is considered an Authority at Caudata.orgmichael is considered an Authority at Caudata.orgmichael is considered an Authority at Caudata.orgmichael is considered an Authority at Caudata.org
Default

My take on it is they don't produce the poison but they possibly concentrate it or alter it. In general c.b. dart frogs have no toxins. Most wild caught dart frogs lose toxicity when kept in captivity. The same species of dart frogs have different toxin profiles depending on where and when they are collected. Wild caught P. terribilis and probably P. aurotaenia do not lose their poison very fast in captivity.
When were the D. azureus released in Hawaii. I thought I kept up on things but this is the first I have heard about this.
michael is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st July 2005   #7 (permalink)
alan
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Gallery Images:
Comments:
Default

Michael,
Just to point out that it's not strictly accurate to say "c.b. dart frogs have no toxins", they do, as do most amphibians. However, the toxin profiles of cb animals are very different to those of wc (endogenous toxin production vs. endogenous + dietary/environmental/processed toxins).
  Reply With Quote
Old 2nd July 2005   #8 (permalink)
2010 Research Grant Donor
 
michael's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Nationality:
Location: [ Members Only ]
Posts: 2,259
Gallery Images: 0
Comments: 0
Rep: michael is considered an Authority at Caudata.orgmichael is considered an Authority at Caudata.orgmichael is considered an Authority at Caudata.orgmichael is considered an Authority at Caudata.orgmichael is considered an Authority at Caudata.orgmichael is considered an Authority at Caudata.orgmichael is considered an Authority at Caudata.orgmichael is considered an Authority at Caudata.orgmichael is considered an Authority at Caudata.orgmichael is considered an Authority at Caudata.org
Default

Alan,
Of course you're correct. What I was meaning was deadly or strong toxins like the ones they are known for in the wild.
michael is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
study


(View-All Members who have read this thread since 14th December 2010, 15:19 (Set) (Clear)

FoxHound
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads

Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
New Study on Salamander Regeneration stormcrow73 Press / News Items 3 2nd July 2009 04:20
Captive Chytrid Study - looking for participants Jennewt General Discussion & News from Members 4 17th April 2009 02:36
Who knows of study pops. in Ohio jbherpin General Discussion & News from Members 14 27th September 2008 05:40
£10m to study how to regrow damaged limbs lims General Discussion & News from Members 5 14th November 2007 20:43
A study of Tweak mik Axolotl Gallery 2 28th January 2005 18:02


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:04.