Ok, my 2 cents in here... somewhat compressed from my original dissertation. This digresses from the initial thread, but addresses some of the comments.
A few comments above tip-toed around condoning rule stretching or breaking.
For the record: I wholeheartedly DO condone breaking rules
Many existing laws are outdated, poorly enforced, or, for lack of a better description stupid. Further, many basically good laws are "lost" through failure to interpret law intent from law letter.
"Bad" laws can be changed through concerted effort of groups, but it's not worth my time to lobby for change of every minutiae of law that is poorly applied. Also, civil disobedience is a larger and more noble process than needs to be discussed here. I am talking about every-day things I do that contravene written laws, but which I do not believe violate society's intentions
I jaywalk
I run red lights (after stopping and looking) at 3am when no one is around
I have changed a light switch in my house (without direct supervision of a certified electrician)
I have shipped small #'s of CB ampib eggs, without profit
I have payed cash for goods and services from private individuals, thus evading our federal Goods and Services tax (ex: I gave my 9yr old neighbor $5 to shovel the sidewalk)
<<<font color="ff0000">Edited>></font>
I guess my point here was not turn this into a confessional, but to suggest that to NOT EVER bend a rule (or worse: to limit public discussion of same) is at least unnecessary, likely preposterous, and at worst, a threat to our very freedom and the viability of our society. *giggle*
Thanks,
Keegan
PS: Comments welcome. Please limit criticism to a reasonable scope of what I've addressed. I have no interest in entertaining wild accusations of me of standing up for someone who pocketed 70grand dealing illegal wildlife.
(Message edited by mike_g on February 27, 2005)