Caudata.org: Newts and Salamanders Portal

Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
Did you know that registered users see fewer ads? Register today!

You gotta love flea markets

I

ian

Guest
well... I have bought 2 30 gallon tank wooden cabinet for 10$
happy.gif
 
J

joan

Guest
I bought a 90 gallon tank and 2 sets of incandescant lights for $11
 

ali

New member
Joined
May 7, 2007
Messages
575
Reaction score
0
If only I could by a house with room to have those size tanks for $11!
happy.gif
 
J

joan

Guest
The 90 is too big for amphibs. It's too deep (I can't reach the bottom comfortably). So I'll be setting it up for my snakes.
 
S

sparda

Guest
<font color="0000ff"> Yay! I got a 55 gallon for free at my next door neighbor's basement! =]</font>
 
J

josh

Guest
I got a 20 gallon for free. Someone had it out to be thrown out and I took it. It's pretty beat up but it works.
 
General chit-chat
Help Users
  • No one is chatting at the moment.
  • Shane douglas:
    with axolotls would I basically have to keep buying and buying new axolotls to prevent inbred breeding which costs a lot of money??
    +1
    Unlike
  • Thorninmyside:
    Not necessarily but if you’re wanting to continue to grow your breeding capacity then yes. Breeding axolotls isn’t a cheap hobby nor is it a get rich quick scheme. It costs a lot of money and time and deditcation
    +1
    Unlike
  • stanleyc:
    @Thorninmyside, I Lauren chen
    +1
    Unlike
  • Clareclare:
    Would Chinese fire belly newts be more or less inclined towards an aquatic eft set up versus Japanese . I'm raising them and have abandoned the terrarium at about 5 months old and switched to the aquatic setups you describe. I'm wondering if I could do this as soon as they morph?
    +1
    Unlike
    Clareclare: Would Chinese fire belly newts be more or less inclined towards an aquatic eft set up versus... +1
    Top