Might be a good idea to stock up...

freves

Active member
Joined
Dec 8, 2003
Messages
1,063
Reaction score
23
Points
38
Age
56
Location
Virginia
Country
United States
Display Name
Foster Reves
Frog killer fungus 'breakthrough'

By Kim Griggs
Science reporter, Wellington

Frog (Image: Conservation International/Don Church)
New Zealand scientists have found what appears to be a cure for the
disease that is responsible for wiping out many of the world's frog
populations.

Chloramphenicol, currently used as an eye ointment for humans, may be
a lifesaver for the amphibians, they say.

The researchers found frogs bathed in the solution became resistant
to the killer disease, chytridiomycosis.

The fungal disease has been blamed for the extinction of one-third of
the 120 species lost since 1980.

Fearful that chytridiomycosis might wipe out New Zealand's critically
endangered Archey's frog (Leiopelma archeyi), the researchers have
been hunting for a compound that would kill off the disease's
trigger, the fungus Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis.

"We are losing an awful lot of these creatures now and if we don't do
something intelligent, then we're going to lose an awful lot more"
Professor Russell Poulter,
Researcher

They tested the chloramphenicol candidate on two species introduced
to New Zealand from Australia: the brown tree frog (Litoria ewingii)
and the southern bell frog (L. raniformis).

"We found that we could cure them completely of chytrids," said Phil
Bishop from the University of Otago.

"And even when they were really sick in the control group, we managed
to bring them back almost from the dead."

"You could put them on their back and they just wouldn't right
themselves, they would just lie there. You could then treat them with
chloramphenicol and they would come right," Dr Bishop explained.

But the Zoological Society of London (ZSL) expressed caution at the
news. Wildlife epidemiologist Dr Trent Garner said there would be
reluctance to take up chloramphenicol as a solution, certainly in
Europe and North America, because of the chemical's link to harmful
side-effects in humans.

Captive solution

The NZ researchers tried using chloramphenicol as both an ointment,
applied to the frogs' backs, and as a solution.

They found that placing the animals in the solution delivered the
best results. The team has admitted it was surprised by the outcome.

"You don't usually expect antibiotics to do anything to fungi at all.
And it does. We don't understand why it does, but it does," said
Russell Poulter.

WHAT ARE AMPHIBIANS?
* Group includes frogs, toads, salamanders and caecilians
* First true amphibians evolved about 250m years ago
* Adapted to many different aquatic and terrestrial habitats
* Present today on every continent except Antarctica
* Undergo metamorphosis, from larvae to adults

Frog (BBC)
Professor Poulter, the molecular biologist who hunted down
chloramphenicol, added: "It's also got the great advantage that it's
incredibly cheap."

The scientists are now making their research widely known ahead of
formal publication in a science journal because of the pressing need
for a safe and effective treatment for the chytrid disease.

The blow that chytrid has dealt to the frog population is already immense.

The disease has probably accounted for one-third of all the losses in
amphibian species to date, says Professor Rick Speare, an expert in
amphibian diseases who works with the University of Otago's frog
research group.

These losses are huge - and this is in addition to other threats such
as habitat destruction, climate change, pollution and hunting.

Since 1980, more than 120 amphibian species have disappeared; and
according to the World Association of Zoos and Aquariums, in the near
future many more species are in danger of vanishing.

AMPHIBIANS: THE ASSESSMENT
Conservation Int/D.Church

<http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/low/science/nature//2/low/science/nature/3743682.stm>Amphibians
in deep trouble

Salamanders (Conservation International/Don Church)
"We are losing an awful lot of these creatures now and if we don't
do something intelligent, then we're going to lose an awful lot
more," said Professor Poulter.

But a hopeful finding is that the introduced frogs that have been
infected with chytrids are now more resistant to further infections.

"We haven't quite understood how that could happen," said Dr Bishop.
"It might be a natural thing; if a frog survives a chytrid infection
then it is resistant when it gets attacked again."

The researchers believe that zoos now will have more options, either
to be able to control an outbreak or to rescue infected frogs from
the wild, knowing that they can be cured.

The next challenge the research team has set itself is to find a
treatment that will work in the wild.

"I would really feel quite satisfied if we could say, 10 years from
now, that you have to be careful walking around [Australia's]
Kosiuszko National Park or you might tread on a corroboree frog
because they're all over the place," said Professor Poulter. "I would
take real satisfaction from that."

However, just how widely chloramphenicol might be adopted is open to
debate. EU and US authorities are concerned the drug may cause
aplastic anaemia in humans. "It is a banned substance; in particular,
it is controlled where it comes into contact with food sources,"
commented Dr Garner from ZSL.

"There are other antifungals that are being piloted and some are
looking promising. Treating infection in amphibians is possible, but
determining if there are any side-effects takes time. Also, how you
apply an antifungal at the individual, the population and the species
level is a whole set of questions which needs to be addressed."

----------

<http://newsvote.bbc.co.uk/mpapps/pagetools/email/news.bbc.co.uk/2/low/science/nature/7067613.stm>E-mail
 
My mistake. I missed that one.
Chip
 
Chloramphenicol has been known for several years as the most effective treatment thus far for chytrid:
2009 publication: Elimination of the amphibian chytrid fungus ... [Dis Aquat Organ. 2009] - PubMed - NCBI

The post in this thread is actually from 2007 though:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/7067613.stm

The protocols from the study in this thread:
http://www.nzfrogs.org/site/nzfrog/files/Treatment%20Protocol.pdf
Australian chytrid manual:
http://www.environment.gov.au/biodiversity/invasive/publications/pubs/chytrid-fungus-manual.pdf
 
This thread itself came from 2007.
 
General chit-chat
Help Users
  • No one is chatting at the moment.
  • Shane douglas:
    with axolotls would I basically have to keep buying and buying new axolotls to prevent inbred breeding which costs a lot of money??
    +1
    Unlike
  • Thorninmyside:
    Not necessarily but if you’re wanting to continue to grow your breeding capacity then yes. Breeding axolotls isn’t a cheap hobby nor is it a get rich quick scheme. It costs a lot of money and time and deditcation
    +1
    Unlike
  • stanleyc:
    @Thorninmyside, I Lauren chen
    +1
    Unlike
  • Clareclare:
    Would Chinese fire belly newts be more or less inclined towards an aquatic eft set up versus Japanese . I'm raising them and have abandoned the terrarium at about 5 months old and switched to the aquatic setups you describe. I'm wondering if I could do this as soon as they morph?
    +1
    Unlike
    Clareclare: Would Chinese fire belly newts be more or less inclined towards an aquatic eft set up versus... +1
    Back
    Top