PDA

View Full Version : Book Review: Salamanders of the United States and Canada (Petranka)


SludgeMunkey
17th May 2009, 03:41
Salamanders of the United States and Canada
James W. Petranka
(Smithsonian Institution Press, 1998)
587 pages


This is the result of the first complete caudate survey in North America published since 1943. It covers the 127 species found north of the Rio Grande River. While the book itself states that there are some arguments about taxonomic status of quite a few subspecies, Petranka tends to avoid these issues and stick to what is generally agreed upon. He skips a lot of the ultra-detailed biology in favor of getting the basics down to help provide positive identification.

Each animal identified in the book has information on identification, systemics, distribution, habitat, reproduction,and ecology. A black and white photograph is also in place for each animal. A full color plates section is also included for many of the more common and beautiful species. Both the scientific nomenclature and the most commonly used common names are also provided. Also included is information for engineers describing conservation biology.

Interesting Highlights:

Introduction and Salamander Identification- From coastal grooves to nasolabial folds, this short section covers the basics of caudate identification. It very plainly demonstrates common practice in species identification.

Unisexual Ambystomatidae: This section covers in detail the various tiger salamander hybrids that exist in the wild. Quite a learning experience!

Full Color Plates: I like to call this the "drool" pages. 172 full color high resolution photographs of the most commonly found caudates in the United States.

Bibliography: It is like a species specific clearing house of every major caudate scientific paper pertaining to the subject matter. In itself, it is hours of reading and research.



Easy to read and coupled with a full bibliography of references, this book is a must have for anyone interested in caudates. It is indispensable for the enthusiast and professional field herpetologist alike! I would refer to this as a field guide, however, the sheer size and weight of this perfectly written book makes it a bit unweildy for pack material. New copies are a bit pricey, ranging up to around 70 USD, however used copies can be purchased for significantly less.

My only real complaint is that there is no field edition available. Personally, I would pay top dollar for a smaller, lighter weight version with water resistant pages I could drag around to every wet spot in the country.

Otterwoman
17th May 2009, 12:12
Thanks, Johnny!

It is currently available on Amazon new from $52.00 and used from $55.24 (weird, I know); I originally got mine on Amazon for about $20. When I don't like what I find on Amazon, I go to Alibris, but in this case their prices are no better.

This book is not just recommended, it's essential!

SludgeMunkey
17th May 2009, 12:37
I watched the prices every day on Amazon until one showed up I liked. Took about three weeks for my cheapskate nature, but it was worth it.

I forgot to add in the review that almost every single university library I checked, and had checked, usually has at least one copy of this book.

In the United States, this is a good thing as most University Libraries are open to the public.

Otterwoman
17th May 2009, 13:12
In the United States, this is a good thing as most University Libraries are open to the public.

You think? I live around the corner from Vassar college, and they will only let me in during their students' break, and I have a PhD! They made me feel like a worm!

SludgeMunkey
17th May 2009, 15:31
Well...that is Vassar for you...

Guess the ones around here are just happy to have someone in there that isn't studying corn!

;)

John
20th May 2009, 09:52
I love this book - put simply there is nothing like it for learning how species tick. However, I wouldn't want a field version of it - I find the Peterson field guide "Reptiles and Amphibians - Eastern Central North America" to be superb and the species are more up to date (which is odd considering Petranka is dated a year later).