bewilderbeast
New member
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2009
- Messages
- 190
- Reaction score
- 10
- Points
- 0
- Location
- Northern California
- Country
- United States
So I was out trying to photograph foothill yellow-legged frogs and found a good looking pool that seemed to have several appropriately sized frogs hopping around. After a patient 20 minute sit by the pool I eventually caught one of these frogs and put him in a tub to photograph only to find that it was, in fact, a small Bullfrog. Since this species is invasive, I did not release it but instead took him home...
I have never found bullfrogs in this location and I know it is a prime mating location for threatened species of trout and California newts. I felt that NOT releasing the frog was the ethical thing to do despite the fact that there is obviously a breeding population of Bullfrogs which produced the numerous smaller frogs to begin with. Any thoughts?
I have no desire to keep this fellow but I also don't want to release him anywhere. What to do in this situation? I thought about donating him to the school I work for or trying to preserve his skeleton for my osteological collection.
I was just curious what other people thought about the ethics of a situation like this.
I have never found bullfrogs in this location and I know it is a prime mating location for threatened species of trout and California newts. I felt that NOT releasing the frog was the ethical thing to do despite the fact that there is obviously a breeding population of Bullfrogs which produced the numerous smaller frogs to begin with. Any thoughts?
I have no desire to keep this fellow but I also don't want to release him anywhere. What to do in this situation? I thought about donating him to the school I work for or trying to preserve his skeleton for my osteological collection.
I was just curious what other people thought about the ethics of a situation like this.