Caudata.org: Newts and Salamanders Portal

Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
Did you know that registered users see fewer ads? Register today!

Herpdigest CITES issue

freves

Active member
Joined
Dec 8, 2003
Messages
1,063
Reaction score
23
Location
Virginia
A friend of mine forwarded me this via email. I know that many of us keep other herps as well so attempted to copy the whole issue however is was just a bit too long so I cut out the reptile section.
Chip




HERPDIGEST SPECIAL CITES ISSUE 7/18/09 – Herp Related Issues to Be
> Discussed at COP15 in Doha, Qatar, March 13-25, 2010.
>
> CITES COP15: USF&WS ANNOUNCEMENT OF SPECIES PROPOSALS AND PROPOSED
> RESOLUTIONS, DECISIONS, AND AGENDA ITEMS BEING CONSIDERED BY THE
> UNITED STATES (This is excerpted from their full summary report,
> herp related Issues only, For full report, with other animals being
> proposed or considered, (Corals, plants, mammals, fish(a lot of
> sharks this time), and/or copy of Federal Register announcement
> email us at asalzberg@herpdigest.org
>
> __________________________________
> DATES: USF&WS will consider written information and comments you
> submit
> concerning potential species proposals, and proposed resolutions,
> decisions,
> and agenda items that the United States is considering submitting for
> consideration at CoP15, and other items relating to CoP15, if
> received them
> September 11, 2009. (See Below for contact information)
>
> _________________________________________________
> DOCUMENT US IS CONSIDERING SUBMITTING FOR DISCUSSION
>
> Asian Snake Trade
>
> The United States is considering submitting a discussion document
> on the conservation issues associated with and management of the
> snake trade in Asia. The international and domestic trade in snakes
> in Asia provides important economic benefits to the region and is
> an important source of medicinals, food, leather, and other
> products. The United States is a large importer of some snake
> products. However, relatively little attention has been paid to
> evaluating and understanding the conservation implications of this
> trade, which involves both wild-caught and farm-raised animals.
> Regular reports of confiscations of international snake shipments
> also indicate a pervasive illegal and undocumented trade to supply
> consumer demand. If the United States decides to submit a document,
> it will focus on opening a dialogue with other Parties, potentially
> by calling for a workshop to discuss these issues, a process
> similar to one recently used to examine the freshwater and
> terrestrial turtle!
> trade.
>
> _________________________________________________________________
>
> THE UNITED STATES IS LIKELY TO DEVELOP AND SUBMIT PROPOSALS FOR THE
> FOLLOWING TAXA PENDING ADDITIONAL INFORMATION AND CONSULTATIONS.
>
> In some cases, the US has completed consultations with relevant
> range countries. In other cases, they expect meetings to occur in
> the immediate future at which participants will generate important
> recommendations, trade analyses, or biological information on the
> taxon in question. See the discussions below for more details. They
> have delineated what additional information they are seeking or
> have sought to assist them in making their decisions.
>
> 1>
> Amphibians
>
> 1) Blue-sided frog (Agalychnis annae) – Inclusion in Appendix II
>
> Defenders of Wildlife and SSN recommended that the United States
> propose the blue-sided frog (Agalychnis annae) for inclusion in
> Appendix II. The species is found only in Costa Rica and has been
> extirpated from streams mostly near San Jose. However, it seems to
> tolerate disturbance in polluted streams and in coffee plantations.
> Threats include susceptibility to predation of larvae by introduced
> fish and chytridiomycosis. The species is listed as endangered by
> IUCN with a declining population trend. Trade data for the species
> is unavailable. Since the species’ range is limited to Costa Rica,
> we will consult with Costa Rica. But, the United States is unlikely
> to submit a proposal for inclusion of this species in Appendix II
> at CoP15 unless significant additional information is received
> about the species’ biological status and trade, or Costa Rica
> requests our assistance.
>
> 2) Morelet’s tree frog (Agalychnis moreletii) – Inclusion in
> Appendix II
>
> Defenders of Wildlife and SSN recommended that the United States
> propose the Morelet’s tree frog (Agalychnis moreletii) for
> inclusion in Appendix II. This species is found in Belize, El
> Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, and Mexico. In Mexico, it has
> disappeared from former survey sites due to chytridiomycosis and is
> probably uncommon, except in breeding aggregations. Wild
> populations in Guatemala and Honduras appear to have declined due
> to habitat loss. The species is listed as critically endangered by
> IUCN with a declining population trend. While it was formerly
> common in the pet trade, recent trade data for 2005 to 2008
> indicate that 188 specimens were imported into the United States:
> 173 of those specimens were wild-caught in Guatemala. Because the
> wild population is very small and fragmented and trade may
> exacerbate population decline caused by the chytrid fungus, we will
> consult with the range countries. However, the United States is
> unlikely to submit a proposal for inclu!
> sion of this species in Appendix II at CoP15 unless significant
> additional information is received about the species’ biological
> status and trade, or a range country requests our assistance.
>
> 3) Rancho Grande harlequin frog (Atelopus cruciger) – Inclusion in
> Appendix II
>
> Defenders of Wildlife and SSN recommended that the United States
> propose the Rancho Grande harlequin frog (Atelopus cruciger) for
> inclusion in Appendix II. This species is only found in the
> Northern and Southern versants of the Corillera de la Costa of
> Venezuela. No specimens have been seen since 1986, except in 2004,
> when a small population was discovered in a cloud forest. Potential
> threats are acid rain, drought, chytridiomycosis, and over-
> collecting. Recent trade data for 2005 to 2008 do not specifically
> indicate the importation of the species into the United States. It
> is listed as critically endangered by IUCN with a declining
> population trend. We will consult with Venezuela, but the United
> States is unlikely to submit a proposal for inclusion of this
> species in Appendix II at CoP15 unless significant additional
> information is received about the species’ biological status and
> trade, or Venezuela requests our assistance.
>
> 4) Helmeted water toad (Caudiverbera caudiverbera) – Inclusion in
> Appendix II
>
> Defenders of Wildlife and SSN recommended that the United States
> propose the helmeted water toad (Caudiverbera caudiverbera) for
> inclusion in Appendix II. This species is found in Chile and
> possibly Argentina, in deep ponds and reservoirs. Threats include
> harvesting for local consumption, water pollution, and consumption
> by introduced trout, and pond drainage. Recent trade data for 2005
> to 2008 do not specifically indicate the importation of the species
> into the United States. It is listed as vulnerable by IUCN with a
> declining population trend. There is no indication that trade is
> impacting the wild population. The United States is unlikely to
> submit a proposal for inclusion of this species in Appendix II at
> CoP15 unless significant additional information is received about
> the species’ biological status and trade, or a range country
> requests our assistance.
>
> 5) Santa Fe frog (Leptodactylus laticeps) – Inclusion in Appendix II
>
> Defenders of Wildlife and SSN recommended that the United States
> propose the Santa Fe frog (Leptodactylus laticeps) for inclusion in
> Appendix II. This species is found in the Gran Chaco of Paraguay,
> Bolivia, and Argentina. It is common in parts of Paraguay and
> Bolivia. Recent trade data for 2005 to 2008 do not specifically
> indicate the importation of the species into the United States.
> However, IUCN identifies overharvesting in Paraguay and Argentina
> for the international pet trade as a cause for its decline. The
> species is listed as near threatened by IUCN with a declining
> population trend. The United States is unlikely to submit a
> proposal for inclusion of this species in Appendix II at CoP15
> unless significant additional information about the species’
> biological status and trade is received, or a range country
> requests our assistance.
>
> 6) Giant Asian river frog (Limnonectes blythii) – Inclusion in
> Appendix II
>
> Defenders of Wildlife and SSN recommended that the United States
> propose the giant Asian river frog (Limnonectes blythii) for
> inclusion in Appendix II. This species is found in Southeast Asia,
> including Laos, Malaysia, Singapore, Thailand, and Viet Nam. It is
> considered very common to not common throughout its range. Local
> consumption and national and international trade threaten the
> species. Recent trade data for 2005 to 2008 indicate the
> importation of 107 specimens of the species into the United States.
> All were wild-caught. The species is listed as near threatened by
> IUCN with a declining population trend. The United States is
> unlikely to submit a proposal for inclusion of this species in
> Appendix II at CoP15 unless significant additional information is
> received about the species’ biological status and trade, or a range
> country requests our assistance.
>
> 7) Fanged river frog (Limnonectes macrodon) – Inclusion in Appendix II
>
> Defenders of Wildlife and SSN recommended that the United States
> propose the fanged river frog (Limnonectes macrodon) for inclusion
> in Appendix II. This species is found in Indonesia on Java and
> Sumatra. It is threatened by agricultural runoff, fuel wood
> collection, pollution, and the international trade for its parts
> and products. Recent U.S. import data do not specifically show
> imports of L. macrodon, but do show imports of Limnonectes spp.
> Between 2005 and 2008, these U.S. records indicate that 64,240
> kilograms of legs, 917 skins, and 75 other products of Limnonectes
> spp. were imported into the United States. All of the specimens,
> except for the “other products,” were reported from captive-bred or
> farmed origin. The species is listed as vulnerable by IUCN with a
> declining population trend. The United States is unlikely to submit
> a proposal for inclusion of this species in Appendix II at CoP15
> unless significant additional information is received about the
> species’ biologi!
> cal status and trade, or Indonesia requests our assistance.
>
> 8) Giant Philippine frog (Limnonectes magnus) – Inclusion in
> Appendix II
>
> Defenders of Wildlife and SSN recommended that the United States
> propose the giant Philippine frog (Limnonectes magnus) for
> inclusion in Appendix II. This species is found in the Philippines
> and Indonesia. It is threatened by agriculture, logging, pollution,
> subsistence harvest, international export, and mine tailings. It is
> protected within protected areas in its range. Recent U.S. import
> data do not specifically show imports of L. magnus, but do show
> imports of Limnonectes spp. Between 2005 and 2008, these U.S.
> records indicate that 64,240 kilograms of legs, 917 skins, and 75
> other products of Limnonectes spp. were imported into the United
> States.
> All of the specimens, except for the “other products,” were
> reported from captive-bred or farmed origin. The species is listed
> as near threatened by IUCN with a declining population trend. The
> United States is unlikely to submit a proposal for inclusion of
> this species in Appendix II unless significant additional
> information is received about the species’ biological status and
> trade, or a range country requests our assistance.
>
> 9) Albanian water frog (Rana shqiperica) – Inclusion in Appendix II
>
> Defenders of Wildlife and SSN recommended that the United States
> propose the Albanian water frog (Rana shqiperica) for inclusion in
> Appendix II. This species is found in Albania, Serbia, and
> Montenegro in freshwater areas. It is threatened by wetland
> drainage, aquatic pollution, the introduction of non-native frogs,
> and overcollection for the commercial market. Recent U.S. trade
> data do not specifically show imports of this species. It is
> considered endangered by IUCN with declining population numbers,
> although IUCN indicates there is no information on the population
> status of the species. The United States is unlikely to submit a
> proposal for inclusion of this species in Appendix II at CoP15
> unless significant additional information is received about the
> species’ biological status and trade, or a range country requests
> our assistance.
>
> 10) Rain frog (Scaphiophryne boribory) – Inclusion in Appendix II
>
> Defenders of Wildlife and SSN recommended that the United States
> propose the rain frog
> (Scaphiophryne boribory) for inclusion in Appendix II. This species
> is found in Madagascar in large flooded areas. It is threatened by
> forest loss through agricultural expansion, timber harvest,
> charcoal production, livestock grazing, and invasive eucalyptus.
> IUCN indicates that the species “might be over collected” for the
> international pet trade. Recent U.S. import data do not
> specifically show imports of S. boribory, but do show imports of
> Scaphiophryne spp. Between 2005 and 2008, the records indicate that
> 183 specimens were imported to the United States, mostly for
> scientific purposes. All were wild-caught and originated in
> Madagascar. This species is considered endangered by IUCN with a
> declining population. We will consult with Madagascar. However, the
> United States is unlikely to submit a proposal for inclusion of
> this species in Appendix II at CoP15 unless significant additional
> information is received about the species’ biological status and
> trade, or Madagascar req!
> uests our assistance.
>
> 11) Alto Verapaz salamander (Bolitoglossa dofleini) – Inclusion in
> Appendix II
>
> Defenders of Wildlife and SSN recommended that the United States
> propose the Alto Verapaz salamander (Bolitoglossa dofleini) for
> inclusion in Appendix II. This species is found in Belize,
> Honduras, and Guatemala. It is extremely common in some areas.
> Chytridiomycosis is a potential threat, but has not yet been
> confirmed in wild populations. The international pet trade may be
> locally unsustainable due to slow maturation in the species (10-12
> years). Between 2005 and 2008, U.S. trade data show 374 specimens,
> all wild-caught, imported into the United States from Honduras and
> Guatemala. The United States is unlikely to submit a proposal for
> inclusion of this species in Appendix II at CoP15 unless
> significant additional information is received about the species’
> biological status and trade, or a range country requests our
> assistance.
>
> 12) Kaiser’s spotted newt (Neurergus kaiseri) – Inclusion in
> Appendix I or II
>
> Defenders of Wildlife and SSN recommended that the United States
> propose the Kaiser’s spotted newt (Neurergus kaiseri) for inclusion
> in Appendix I, and TRAFFIC recommended the United States propose
> this species for inclusion in Appendix II. The Kaiser’s spotted
> newt is found in three streams in the southern Zorgo Mountains in
> Iran. There may be fewer than 1,000 mature individuals remaining
> due to dam construction and drought. Although the species has
> national protection, the illegal pet trade may affect the
> population through harvesting of mature individuals. IUCN has
> listed the species as critically endangered with a declining
> population trend.
>
> Recent U.S. import data do not specifically show imports of N.
> kaiseri, but do show that, between 2005 and 2008, the United States
> imported 82 specimens of Neurergus spp., all of which were reported
> to be captive-bred in Europe. Citing TRAFFIC North America (2006),
> the proponents note that, in December 2004, 50 specimens were
> announced for sale via internet websites, and a European dealer
> allegedly traded approximately 200 specimens early in 2005
 
General chit-chat
Help Users
  • No one is chatting at the moment.
  • Shane douglas:
    with axolotls would I basically have to keep buying and buying new axolotls to prevent inbred breeding which costs a lot of money??
    +1
    Unlike
  • Thorninmyside:
    Not necessarily but if you’re wanting to continue to grow your breeding capacity then yes. Breeding axolotls isn’t a cheap hobby nor is it a get rich quick scheme. It costs a lot of money and time and deditcation
    +1
    Unlike
  • stanleyc:
    @Thorninmyside, I Lauren chen
    +1
    Unlike
  • Clareclare:
    Would Chinese fire belly newts be more or less inclined towards an aquatic eft set up versus Japanese . I'm raising them and have abandoned the terrarium at about 5 months old and switched to the aquatic setups you describe. I'm wondering if I could do this as soon as they morph?
    +1
    Unlike
    Clareclare: Would Chinese fire belly newts be more or less inclined towards an aquatic eft set up versus... +1
    Top