Caudata.org: Newts and Salamanders Portal

Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
Did you know that registered users see fewer ads? Register today!

Victory for California Tiger Salamander

hdonahue

New member
Joined
Jul 29, 2011
Messages
117
Reaction score
3
Location
IL
The Press Democrat, August 30, 2011 Smaller salamander protection zone unveiled for Sonoma County
By Brett Wilkison
Federal officials Tuesday released what they hope will be a final ruling on the area they would oversee in the heart of Sonoma County to protect the endangered California tiger salamander.
The latest plan may wind up in court, however, as part of an ongoing fight over a proposed tribal casino in Rohnert Park. The casino site has been excluded from the salamander protection zone.
Another lawsuit would extend what is now a six-year back-and-forth battle over salamander protections spanning two presidential administrations and featuring advocates of stronger endangered species safeguards on one side and those concerned about the economic effect of heavy handed land-use restrictions on the other.
The latest so-called “critical habitat” ruling seeks to end that fracas by striking a balance between environmental and economic concerns, federal wildlife officials said. It is tot ake effect in 30 days.
At 47,383 acres, the new salamander zone is 8,417 acres smaller than a proposal put forward in June and 27,000 acres smaller than the largest plan, which was proposed in 2005 and put forward again in 2009.
Officials with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, which oversees salamander protection, said they settled on the smaller figure after taking out land already developed or isolated from other habitat, or land not seen as essential to the recovery of the rare species.
The new zone occupies a swath of land stretching from the northwestern outskirts of Windsor to Pepper Road just north of Petaluma, and from the main waterway of the Laguna de Santa Rosa in the west to Petaluma Hill Road in the east.
The zone includes the Roblar Road area west of Cotati and developer John Barella's proposed rock quarry. County officials said previously that the quarry's inclusion “would not make much difference” to the project.
Generally, a critical habitat designation triggers an additional layer of review and habitat safeguards for projects requiring federal approval.
The plan has earned the backing of the Center for Biological Diversity, the national environmental group that sued the Fish and Wildlife Service in 2008 after the Bush administration reversed course and proposed to designate no habitat for the salamander.
Noah Greenwald, the group's endangered species director, said federal authorities had a “reasonable basis” for making the latest reductions to the habitat zone.
But opponents of a casino proposed in Rohnert Park by the Federated Indians of Graton Rancheria are unhappy about one of those changes. The new plan exempts 252-acres owned by the tribe and eyed in part for the casino off Wilfred Avenue.
Federal officials defended the exemption on two grounds, saying the tribe's management plan for salamanders was sufficient without the habitat designation and that the benefits of excluding the land outweighed the benefits including it, a catchall determination allowed under the Endangered Species Act.
Chip Worthington, a Rohnert Park pastor who founded the Stop the Casino 101 group, called the move “inconsistent and flawed.”
He vowed that both the tribe's salamander plan and the decision to exempt its land from critical habitat would be part of a lawsuit the group is planning against the casino's environmental studies.
“This is no big shock to us,” Worthington said.
Greg Sarris, chairman of the Graton Rancheria, could not be reached for comment Tuesday night.
Copyright © 2011 PressDemocrat.com
This article originally appeared here.



Smaller salamander protection zone unveiled for Sonoma County
 

FrogEyes

Active member
Joined
Sep 5, 2010
Messages
908
Reaction score
41
Location
Southern Minnesota
What isn't mentioned is that both the Santa Barbara and Sonoma county salamanders are suspected of being distinct species from the more widespread California tiger. That makes this habitat all the more critical.
 

otolith

Member
Joined
Dec 16, 2009
Messages
484
Reaction score
22
Saw this article in the paper today, nice to see a bit more land being set aside for them. I live a few miles from both the sites they mention in the article. There is an area near my house (non protected area - small family owned farm) where I have observed them before, really beautiful animals.
 
General chit-chat
Help Users
  • No one is chatting at the moment.
  • Shane douglas:
    with axolotls would I basically have to keep buying and buying new axolotls to prevent inbred breeding which costs a lot of money??
    +1
    Unlike
  • Thorninmyside:
    Not necessarily but if you’re wanting to continue to grow your breeding capacity then yes. Breeding axolotls isn’t a cheap hobby nor is it a get rich quick scheme. It costs a lot of money and time and deditcation
    +1
    Unlike
  • stanleyc:
    @Thorninmyside, I Lauren chen
    +1
    Unlike
  • Clareclare:
    Would Chinese fire belly newts be more or less inclined towards an aquatic eft set up versus Japanese . I'm raising them and have abandoned the terrarium at about 5 months old and switched to the aquatic setups you describe. I'm wondering if I could do this as soon as they morph?
    +1
    Unlike
    Clareclare: Would Chinese fire belly newts be more or less inclined towards an aquatic eft set up versus... +1
    Top