‘Evolutionary Gem’ By Kim Burgess

AaronK

2010 Research Grant Donor
Joined
May 7, 2007
Messages
142
Reaction score
11
Points
18
Location
California
Country
United States
Display Name
AaronK
‘Evolutionary Gem’

news01-01-09-09.jpg

Photo courtesy USU Public Relations and Marketing


A garter snake eats a newt in this undated photo.


By Kim Burgess
Published:
Friday, January 9, 2009 1:35 AM CST
USU professor’s Darwinian theory study appears in Nature magazine

Research led by a Utah State University professor is among the best evidence of Darwin’s evolutionary theories, according to Nature magazine.

Edmund “Butch” Brodie Jr., a faculty member in USU’s biology department, studies garter snakes’ ability to eat highly poisonous newts. The amphibians are so toxic that one could kill dozens of humans.

The work was listed among 15 studies that Nature called “Evolutionary Gems” for demonstrating that Charles Darwin’s ideas are supported by evidence.


The article, printed in the January 2009 issue, is subtitled “A resource from Nature for those wishing to spread awareness of evidence for evolution by natural selection.” It was compiled to recognize the 200th anniversary of the famed evolutionary biologist’s birth.

“Given that the concepts and realities of Darwinian evolution are still challenged, albeit rarely by biologists, a succinct briefing on why evolution by natural selection is an empirically validated principle is useful for people to have on hand,” the Nature editors wrote in their introduction.

Brodie’s work adds to that validation by showing that garter snakes and newts have been evolving together since the last ice age ended in 12,000 B.C.

During that time, the newts have grown more toxic, while the snakes have developed greater resistance to the compound, allowing them continue eating the amphibians.

For most of millennia, the evolutionary arms race between the two creatures was a draw. The snakes succeeded in eating some newts, and the newts succeeded in poisoning some snakes.

But recently one group of snakes won hands down.

A team headed by Brodie discovered that garter snakes in the San Francisco Bay area have an exceptional resistance to the newt’s toxin.

Basically, the snakes can eat with abandon; no newt can do them in.

One of the USU professor’s former doctoral student, Shana Geffeney, built on his work, eventually discovering the molecular basis for the snakes’ ability. Geffeney, who is now at the Stanford School of Medicine, showed that the reptiles have a change in a particular sodium channel, which prevents the newt poison from binding to their cells. This research, published in Nature in 2005, was highlighted as an “Evolutionary Gems” — number 14 on the list.

Also included in the article are studies that examine the origin of feathers and the spread of animals from water onto land.

To see the full list, go to www.nature.com/nature/newspdf/evolutiongems.pdf.

Thanks to Steve G. for emailing this to me.
 
General chit-chat
Help Users
  • No one is chatting at the moment.
  • Shane douglas:
    with axolotls would I basically have to keep buying and buying new axolotls to prevent inbred breeding which costs a lot of money??
    +1
    Unlike
  • Thorninmyside:
    Not necessarily but if you’re wanting to continue to grow your breeding capacity then yes. Breeding axolotls isn’t a cheap hobby nor is it a get rich quick scheme. It costs a lot of money and time and deditcation
    +1
    Unlike
  • stanleyc:
    @Thorninmyside, I Lauren chen
    +1
    Unlike
  • Clareclare:
    Would Chinese fire belly newts be more or less inclined towards an aquatic eft set up versus Japanese . I'm raising them and have abandoned the terrarium at about 5 months old and switched to the aquatic setups you describe. I'm wondering if I could do this as soon as they morph?
    +1
    Unlike
    Clareclare: Would Chinese fire belly newts be more or less inclined towards an aquatic eft set up versus... +1
    Back
    Top