PLEASE READ: Risks of Intrastate Shipping of Banned Species

DartFrog180

New member
Joined
Mar 16, 2015
Messages
14
Reaction score
3
Points
3
Location
Chicago Area, Illinois/USA
Country
United States
Hi Folks:
I noticed some people are still offering here or in other places sales of the banned species to "in-state" buyers and offering to ship.

I am not an attorney, but I think that practice may present some risk, potentially considerable, of violating the Lacey Act under the interim rule banning 201 species from interstate transport. Here's why...

When you ship to a buyer within your state you should NOT assume that the package will stay in state. My understanding of the shipping/logistics industry (a good friend is an exec in one such company and confirmed this) relies on complicated software to profitably get packages from point A to point B. This does NOT mean the packages follow a straight line, and in fact, depending on your location and that of the buyer it is possible the package could stop in one or even MORE states on its way to the final destination.

As an example I first learned of this after buying a (non-live) item on EBAY a couple years ago. The seller sent an automated tracking number and I found out they were located only five miles from me. However, as I tracked the package, I was amazed to see it was picked up from the seller, taken to the nearest large airport (one of the world's busiest passenger and cargo hubs) and put on a plane ( I assume because it was scanned here about three hours before it was scanned there, which would have been impossible by ground transport) to Dayton, OH. There it was scanned, again, and put back on a plane, flown back to my state and delivered (48 hours after initial pickup from the seller) to my doorstep. I found this quite inefficient (okay, asinine), so I asked my logistics friend, and he confirmed this is common if not standard practice for most such companies. In the scheme of things a small package put on a plane or a big truck to go to a sorting hub elsewhere can still be profitable, and the routes are all calculated to keep the packages flowing for profitability and efficiency within a companies systems.

So, why I think this applies to the interstate ban should be obvious, but in case not...

IF you sell even to a buyer in-state, and the salamander/newt crossed state lines in the process of shipping, as the package I described above, I bet it could technically be enforced. The courier just provides the service of transport and delivery, and would not bear responsibility because you shipped the merchandise. Again, I am not an attorney, nor am I trying to scare anyone. But the Lacey Act has very tough penalties available, so unless someone can confirm this interpretation is wrong, and why, I would urge great caution in shipping even "in-state" until there is more clarification after the comment period and final rule issued by USFWS.
 

jewett

Site Contributor
Joined
Sep 25, 2004
Messages
827
Reaction score
26
Points
28
Location
West Jordan UT
Country
United States
Display Name
Heather Jewett
Hi Folks:
My understanding of the shipping/logistics industry (a good friend is an exec in one such company and confirmed this) relies on complicated software to profitably get packages from point A to point B.
So does the USPS fall under the "shipping/logistics industry" and if so do they also use this method to ship? If memory serves, I don't think I have ever received a newt related package from a private individual that was not shipped via USPS (instead of UPS, FedEx, etc)... Anyway, interesting point.

HJ
 

FrogEyes

Active member
Joined
Sep 5, 2010
Messages
908
Reaction score
36
Points
28
Location
Southern Minnesota
Country
Canada
Although you're right about the process, I doubt it would lead to enforcement, much less prosecution. There's no demonstrable intent to cross a state line, even though it may occur incidentally/accidentally. As far as the buyer and seller know, it's a completely legal intrastate movement. Under other circumstances of accidental transport, USFWS has been unable to do anything [water moved intentionally between states, and injurious species being moved accidentally with it].
 

DartFrog180

New member
Joined
Mar 16, 2015
Messages
14
Reaction score
3
Points
3
Location
Chicago Area, Illinois/USA
Country
United States
As I said in my initial post, I am not positive of this interpretation, but as I also said, the potential penalties if there was a decision to enforce on this are severe enough that most people would probably not want to take the risk...your choice.

From the communities perspective, I also submit that we should discourage finding, claiming to find, and especially exploiting perceived loopholes. That just makes it look like we're already disregarding the rule rather than trying to work in ernest to try to improve it by addressing the parts that may not have been well conceived.
 

Pop Alexandra

New member
Joined
Mar 12, 2018
Messages
8
Reaction score
1
Points
3
Location
Cluj
Country
Romania
Did anyone experience any repercussions due to these regulations?
Should I worry about this and contact some cargo company?
_______________________________________
Alexandra from Cargolution logistics
 

FrogEyes

Active member
Joined
Sep 5, 2010
Messages
908
Reaction score
36
Points
28
Location
Southern Minnesota
Country
Canada
Rephrase - the ban is NOT over. The interstate movement portion of the ban was never legal, and the courts agreed and ruled a year ago that USFWS had no authority to ban interstate movements. It is [and always was] legal to ship within the USA, EXCEPT to Hawai'i, Puerto Rico, USVI, or DC. Ship within any state or territory, and ship between the 49 mainland states, but not into any territory, any island territory or state, into the 49 from anywhere else, or anywhere into the USA from another country.

It sounds complicated, though it's really not. There are 49 mainland states [DC is a territory and not legally a mainland state]. These are considered one unit under this law, and any shipping inside this unit is okay. Shipping between regions isn't okay, and most of the named regions are actually islands with respect to one another, and would be hard for invasives to move between on their own. Conversely, any invasive species already in CONUS can theoretically move on its own over any state line, making a ban on shipping somewhat pointless [and contrary to other laws and state and personal rights].

The import ban is also only for those 200+ identified species, allowing for the fact that there are errors and some species are banned without being listed by name.
 

MisterWayne

New member
Joined
Nov 19, 2018
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Points
1
Location
Chicago
Country
United States
Display Name
Mister Wayne
FrogEyes, quick question. Im in Chicago Illinois, if I were to then find a seller within the US that is not located in one of the Territories you mentioned or Island states who has CB salamanders (lets say fire salamanders b/c i know those are on the ban list), The seller would be able to ship them to me then correct? if neither of us are within those ban territories?
 

Pop Alexandra

New member
Joined
Mar 12, 2018
Messages
8
Reaction score
1
Points
3
Location
Cluj
Country
Romania
FrogEyes, quick question. Im in Chicago Illinois, if I were to then find a seller within the US that is not located in one of the Territories you mentioned or Island states who has CB salamanders (lets say fire salamanders b/c i know those are on the ban list), The seller would be able to ship them to me then correct? if neither of us are within those ban territories?
Indeed. That would be the best case scenario.
 
General chit-chat
Help Users
  • No one is chatting at the moment.
  • AlexisJG:
    As long as they don’t seem stressed that’s good and I mean hey if their well fed maybe they’ll live long happy lives together.
    +2
    Unlike
  • HalfDrunkToast:
    oh ya they are happy xD every time i come in to my room my Koy betta is like HI HI HI and actively swimming around
    +1
    Unlike
  • Chat Bot:
    Calgarycoppers has left the room.
    +1
    Unlike
  • Nerodia1:
    Děkuji za přijetí. Hledám tohoto obojživelníka, Typhlonectes compressicauda, nevíte, kde ho získat, nejlépe někde v Evropě.
    +1
    Unlike
  • Chat Bot:
    Caudex has left the room.
    +1
    Unlike
  • Chat Bot:
    VEEK has left the room.
    +1
    Unlike
  • Lanalotl:
    My axie is acting woerd he was a rescue as stated in a different post he got better and now seems to be deteriorating again...again all tank conditions are OK and as should be. He seems to have some black dapple like pattern under his bottom lip? Is that normal? And his two back feet have a little wierd growth? Almost? Tiny tiny tiny lump. His capillaries in his feathers also appear darker and more visible. Any help would be appreciated
    +1
    Unlike
  • Lanalotl:
    Hes a leucistic axie
    +1
    Unlike
  • Chat Bot:
    AmphibiGirl has left the room.
    +1
    Unlike
  • Dibgame:
    Hey guys. First time on this forum and im not sure what formatting i should use but hey here i go.
    +1
    Unlike
  • Jadezoey:
    Hi! I'm being in a hard position where I have to re-home my axolotls. I'm moving out and I would like to find them a new home with someone who can take proper care of them
    +1
    Unlike
  • Jadezoey:
    I have an adult wild type and a juvenile leucistc
    +1
    Unlike
  • Unlike
  • BigAl:
    Oops my bad accidentally sent that
    +1
    Unlike
  • Binditheaxolotl:
    @HalfDrunkToastLol
    +1
    Unlike
  • AxieMomma87:
    is anyone online???
    +1
    Unlike
  • Chat Bot:
    Calgarycoppers has joined the room.
    +1
    Unlike
  • Unlike
  • Chat Bot:
    Calgarycoppers has left the room.
    +1
    Unlike
  • AxieMomma87:
    Are you still here
    +1
    Unlike
  • ZayneSantos:
    Is there anyone on who can give me advice?
    +1
    Unlike
  • Max2445:
    @ZayneSantos, What advice do you need
    +1
    Unlike
  • KrabzAga:
    based on this video what type of salamander might this larva be? I suspect either eastern newt or spotted salamander
    +1
    Unlike
  • KrabzAga:
    help appreciated
    +1
    Unlike
  • KrabzAga:
    they are from missouri
    +1
    Unlike
    KrabzAga: they are from missouri +1
    Top