blueberlin
2010 Research Grant Donor
Re: eggsplosion
I can survive a bass.
And I'm glad that only a percentage of my fellow species are still apes..
Actually - I've been out of school for a long, long time - isn't "species" the finest classification on the biological hierarchy? The bottom of the divisionary line? But isn't a species defined by being capable of interbreeding and producing viable, fertile offspring? So where is the dividing line between, let's just say, an axolotl and a tiger salamander? Obviously they are different animals - but if they can reproduce and their young can reproduce with others of their ilk.. I assume we would then have yet a third "species"? (and a human gets to name it, hoorah)
What about the mule (everyone's favorite example of a crossbreed), it is certainly a new kind of animal but is not even fertile, so is it a new a new species?
I'm trying to understand the significance of the delineation in the hope of differentiating between evolution and bastardization.
I can survive a bass.
And I'm glad that only a percentage of my fellow species are still apes..
Actually - I've been out of school for a long, long time - isn't "species" the finest classification on the biological hierarchy? The bottom of the divisionary line? But isn't a species defined by being capable of interbreeding and producing viable, fertile offspring? So where is the dividing line between, let's just say, an axolotl and a tiger salamander? Obviously they are different animals - but if they can reproduce and their young can reproduce with others of their ilk.. I assume we would then have yet a third "species"? (and a human gets to name it, hoorah)
What about the mule (everyone's favorite example of a crossbreed), it is certainly a new kind of animal but is not even fertile, so is it a new a new species?
I'm trying to understand the significance of the delineation in the hope of differentiating between evolution and bastardization.