Eft weighs over 2 grams by now, though weight fluctuates significantly with defecation. This morning I found his stool inside of the water bowl for the first time, he usually poops on land. It was oddly round and definitely greater than the width of his cloaca, so he might've decided to use the water to soften it a bit so he could pass it easier. Usually his waste is somewhat oblong but this was basically spherical. I might dial back the calcium a bit.
Defecating in the water to make it easier to pass large waste products is a fascinating adaptation; honestly this probably evolved because amphibians have a propensity to happily swallow any soil that may be coating their slimy prey at the time of eating it, and it's an interesting way to deal with potential impaction problems. Though at this time I'm absolutely not going to purposely impact my newt to test whether this theory is correct, my mind now rests slightly more at ease whenever I watch him repeatedly miss the worm sitting millimeters in front of him to bite the dirt next to it instead.
Since I now have enough data for some basic analysis, I plotted his weight over time and tried a linear vs exponential fit to get a better idea of his growth trends. Somewhat to my surprise, the exponential fit was a good bit more accurate, suggesting his growth will only continue to accelerate.
Most importantly,
note the large uptick in growth starting around the beginning of February when I started providing calcium again. Granted, this is a correlation between only two points (so far), but this is a growth rate of about 0.0375 g/day over a period of 8 days. This is 3.1x faster than the average of all previous intervals (0.012 g/day), and 3.6x faster than the linear model's constant rate (0.010 g/day), In just 8 days, he gained 0.30g, compared to 0.65g over the previous 58 days. The linear model predicts 0.083g growth, while the exponential model predicts 0.128g growth over this time period. The actual growth was 0.300g. This means the spike exceeded even the exponential model (which assumes accelerating growth) by 134%.
The February 7 data point sits 2.03 standard deviations above the linear trend line. In statistics, deviations greater than 2 SD are considered highly significant, and given the long trend of consistent growth before this, it's highly unlikely to be just random variation. The next highest growth rate in any previous interval was 0.040 g/day (October 12-15), and the most recent spike starting when calcium was supplemented again was still nearly double that rate.
This is probably the most significant result I've gotten so far in terms of scientific insight. I'm obviously going to continue measuring and if the growth continues at the highly elevated rate that it's been at recently, then I believe we've anecdotally answered the question of whether or not calcium is required for torosa on a diet of earthworms. Something else that might be interesting would be to test the effects of calcium dust with vitamin D3 vs calcium dust without it, but a comparative analysis like that would require a much larger sample size. Next fall I plan to buy at least 20 efts, ideally from the same clutch, to test this.