Azhael
Site Contributor
- Joined
- May 7, 2007
- Messages
- 6,644
- Reaction score
- 120
- Points
- 0
- Location
- Burgos
- Country
- Spain
- Display Name
- Rodrigo
The majority of those threads are people trying to cycle the tank with the animals already in. How´s that indicative of problems when things are done properly and the tank is properly cycled in advanced? The rest are flukes or the product of very bad ideas. It would be like judging your method by the actions of someone who missed the water changes for days at a time or made the changes with untreated water at a different temperature. It´s not an indication of a fault with the method, but a fault in the execution. When cycling is done properly it can´t be considered difficult or problematic. When it´s done very badly, of course it´s a problem...but any method works badly if you don´t do it as you should.
I think drinking beer is very, very easy, and yet my friend tried to drink it through a nostril and made a horrible mess....what a surprise!
If the method you describe was the predominant one among newbies you think we wouldn´t hear things like "I put my axie in a lidless tupperware and overnight it jumped out and it´s now dead, what did i do wrong?". Not the method´s fault. People WILL find ways of messing up even with the simplest tasks.
Plus i got the impresion that none of those examples actually fit the method i described. I didn´t mention the use of filters, plastic plants, etc...
Anyway, what´s clear is that ad hominem attacks don´t prove points.
I think drinking beer is very, very easy, and yet my friend tried to drink it through a nostril and made a horrible mess....what a surprise!
If the method you describe was the predominant one among newbies you think we wouldn´t hear things like "I put my axie in a lidless tupperware and overnight it jumped out and it´s now dead, what did i do wrong?". Not the method´s fault. People WILL find ways of messing up even with the simplest tasks.
Plus i got the impresion that none of those examples actually fit the method i described. I didn´t mention the use of filters, plastic plants, etc...
Anyway, what´s clear is that ad hominem attacks don´t prove points.
Last edited: